When I processed this RAW data in Bridge, I used very little of clarity or contrast and only a tick more sharpening in the DETAILS tab, as I did bump up the NR from the base of 0. I love the benefit of DeepPrime - but would really want to tweak how the sharpening elements are applied. It's like it is applying a level of clarity and contrast equally to the whole image, while ignoring the aperture setting - f/2.8 in this instance. I intend to have parts of my images softer - more out of focus. I typically shoot aperture priority with long lenses. This would be great for a wide angle shot if I want maximum DOF. And, if I have an issue with it - it is this later point - it creates more detail from front to back in the scene. Initially gut opinion - it strips grain very well - and maintains good detail. Beyond that you choose the file, or drag and drop, and choose whether to output to a JPG or DNG. This is where there are user options - you choose, HD, Prime, or DeepPrime. They use what they know about your camera and lens, as long as it is in their database - as well as their noise reduction capabilities. The weakest point - they do the processing with no user input. TAKE with a grain of salt - this tidbit of opinion is from one image. So, I downloaded the free trial - and tried a recent image with it. This gives a person access to DeepPrime, their noise processing element that seems to do some pretty nice work. but I was curious about this, as an initial step given it can render a DNG, allowing me to further tinker with the file. I have been using ACR via Bridge forever.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |